tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post3320382871372868700..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: New paper claims 'deniers' who use Google are not 'people that genuinely want to learn more' about climateUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-41485065569726911632014-07-21T06:10:54.642-07:002014-07-21T06:10:54.642-07:00Did they check out the searches in Google Scholar ...Did they check out the searches in Google Scholar or on the ordinary Google search engine.<br /><br />I bet they missed Google Scholar.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-25216548634677494532014-07-19T13:38:18.743-07:002014-07-19T13:38:18.743-07:00It is indeed a highly-biased, condescending, unpro...It is indeed a highly-biased, condescending, unprofessional paper which uses unscientific terminology such as 'denier' and makes numerous unsupported assertions. MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-2756864580927075862014-07-19T13:10:27.144-07:002014-07-19T13:10:27.144-07:00Interesting paper. It says democrats and more educ...Interesting paper. It says democrats and more educated individuals search the climate terms when the average temperature changes. But I wonder how does this work when average temperatures are usually changing anyway? Does this mean democrats and educates have a baseline and fairly constant search pattern, and republicans and less educated people only look when they sense a climate extreme? It seems to be a goofy paper. Fernando Leanmehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16085680730729620836noreply@blogger.com