tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post3599319156726663796..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: New paper falsifies basis of the theory of man-made global warmingUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-67018650573579515652012-11-01T09:10:18.308-07:002012-11-01T09:10:18.308-07:00Sorry, but the basis of the theory is also not int...Sorry, but the basis of the theory is also not intact due to erroneous application of the physics of heat transfer<br /><br />http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2012/10/astrophysicist-explains-why.htmlMShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-68001145445906679152012-11-01T06:34:57.866-07:002012-11-01T06:34:57.866-07:00Sorry, but the basis of the theory remains intact:...Sorry, but the basis of the theory remains intact: that's the physics of radiative heat transfer.<br /><br />What's negated is the observation of the consequences of the theory in the real world of planet Earth. <br /><br />While the basic theory remains intact it seems that it either does not apply to our Earth system, it is countered by negative feedbacks, its magnitude is not measurable or that it could be found flawed in the future.<br /><br />The GCM's are definitely invalidated. Did you notice how the paper allows for the difference to be attributed to observational error? That's because the gravy train goes off the tracks if the models are wrong.Parma Johnnoreply@blogger.com