tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post4056920152946201923..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: Why Antarctica also doesn't need 'saving'Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-53771609772002459992013-11-15T22:50:00.017-08:002013-11-15T22:50:00.017-08:00http://www.kaltesonne.de/?p=6020http://www.kaltesonne.de/?p=6020Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-5199669584792369442013-08-12T18:17:19.865-07:002013-08-12T18:17:19.865-07:00http://blogs.plos.org/models/no-need-to-worry-abou...http://blogs.plos.org/models/no-need-to-worry-about-greenlands-waterslides/MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-50630616981941210692013-08-05T19:13:06.658-07:002013-08-05T19:13:06.658-07:00http://www.clim-past.net/9/1773/2013/cp-9-1773-201...http://www.clim-past.net/9/1773/2013/cp-9-1773-2013.htmlMShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-81562399752387933712013-01-30T12:58:03.605-08:002013-01-30T12:58:03.605-08:00http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/10/icesat-data-...http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/10/icesat-data-shows-mass-gains-of-the-antarctic-ice-sheet-exceed-losses/MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-14872648271675534952013-01-28T15:03:42.403-08:002013-01-28T15:03:42.403-08:00comment at NYT
Semper NonfidelisBoston, MA.
To: ...comment at NYT<br /><br />Semper NonfidelisBoston, MA.<br /><br />To: L. Harrison, PhD. It is worth noting that the the ice of Western side of the Antarctica sits on the ocean floor. Archimedes Principle applies.MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-40599192524690414712013-01-25T12:40:57.588-08:002013-01-25T12:40:57.588-08:00New post today:
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com...New post today:<br /><br />http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2013/01/new-paper-finds-antarctic-sea-ice-has.htmlMShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-67489263635249478902013-01-25T10:11:12.364-08:002013-01-25T10:11:12.364-08:00comment at Revkin's site:
Stan0301 Colorado
...comment at Revkin's site:<br /><br />Stan0301 Colorado<br /><br />Antarctica has been frozen since the Miocene when South America separated from Antarctica and the South Circumpolar Current started to flow. It has seen warmer times than today and hasn't melted. Even if it were to melt the weight of the ice has depressed the land to well below sea level, and as water occupies 10% less volume than the ice that it came from that space (below sea level) that it formerly occupied would be more than able to handle it. Indeed if the ice cap were to melt the freed up volume where the ice used to be would be so able to handle the volume of water produced that sea level would actually fall.<br />Jan. 25, 2013 at 4:54 a.m.MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-91573983020786230292013-01-25T08:09:07.937-08:002013-01-25T08:09:07.937-08:001. The denier word is not allowed on this site. Re...1. The denier word is not allowed on this site. Read the comment policy. Are you denying natural climate change has resulted in much warmer climates than today and that there is no evidence it was due to CO2?<br /><br />2. There is no evidence that there will be significant sea rise. The sea rise of the past 18,000 years has decelerated over the 20th and 21st centuries and shows no evidence of a human fingerprint.<br /><br />http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2012/12/noaa-2012-report-finds-sea-levels.html<br /><br />3. Your cherry-picked article in National Geographic is directly contradicted by the more recent model in the first study I listed above, and others.<br /><br />4. Apparently you don't understand that the 2nd part of the post is from a newspaper and written by Lewis Page. Page. If you want to reply to him on condescension & boffinry do so at his site.MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-53841049589756780942013-01-25T03:23:51.521-08:002013-01-25T03:23:51.521-08:00You're cherry-picking bits and pieces of studi...You're cherry-picking bits and pieces of studies to back up the climate-change-denial narrative, trying to portray this as a still dubious and debated question. The overwhelming majority of evidence shows a future of melting - in BOTH Antarctica and Greenland; that basic scenario hasn't changed - and significant sea level rise. The explanation for current Antarctic ice gain is out there, too, which is a fact that you conspicuously leave out of this post. <br /><br />http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/08/100816-global-warming-antarctica-sea-ice-paradox-science-environment/<br /><br />Or is that also too much "boffinry?" As a side note, using condescending names for the people you disagree with doesn't exactly make you more credible. Ellanoreply@blogger.com