tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post587653264976440009..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: Solar Physicist Dr. C. de Jager predicts Grand Solar Minimum will last until 2100Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-89239755111158238342013-09-02T17:19:45.436-07:002013-09-02T17:19:45.436-07:00Predicted by Theodore Landscheidt. We are enteri...Predicted by Theodore Landscheidt. We are entering the Landscheidt minimum. http://www.landscheidt.info/RayGunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02558983185935622861noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-24843129969038352482011-06-26T07:38:17.548-07:002011-06-26T07:38:17.548-07:00Further plots showing predicted Grand Minima for t...Further plots showing predicted Grand Minima for the next two cycles:<br /><br />http://landscheidt.wordpress.com/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-9418858215534647022011-06-26T07:01:40.850-07:002011-06-26T07:01:40.850-07:00Please refer to Landscheidt's predictions. Hi...Please refer to Landscheidt's predictions. His correlations in solar output to solar system barycenter have been accurate and are showing to be true today. His work showed this 20 years ago. The current solar cycle through 2036 will have an extended minimum resulting cooling. Then an extended warming era will begin. <br />http://www.landscheidt.info/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-9818844005360432432011-06-22T18:52:05.559-07:002011-06-22T18:52:05.559-07:00Bob Armstrong,
Q: how did you calculate average t...Bob Armstrong,<br /><br />Q: how did you calculate average temp of the moon as I presume 5 C ?<br /><br />you might be interested in<br /><br />http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2010/08/is-greenhouse-effect-is-based-on-cool.htmlMShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-25949971578574812642011-06-22T11:51:35.937-07:002011-06-22T11:51:35.937-07:00We are only about 10 kelvin more than the temperat...We are only about 10 kelvin more than the temperature of a gray ball in our orbit . We've only seen about a 0.25% change of our temperature over the last century which is linear with , and about 1/21 the sun's . Our total "warming" would only require about a 15k increase in the sun's approximately 5800k temperature . I'm actually surprised , and thankful , the sun is as stable as it is .Bob Armstronghttp://cosy.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-878227035742333352011-06-20T11:18:09.573-07:002011-06-20T11:18:09.573-07:00He will be wrong . . .There will be no repeat of ...He will be wrong . . .There will be no repeat of the "Maunder Minimum" . . . We have not been studying the sun for enough time . . . . the earth has only been "round" for a relitively short time . . . and not he "center" of the "universe"! We will have another that will say he will be wrong and one will get funding for being right! The very nature of a "hedge fund" Laurie BowenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-84449418847654288082011-06-20T09:57:28.288-07:002011-06-20T09:57:28.288-07:00I've read the "doubling of the Sun’s coro...I've read the "doubling of the Sun’s coronal magnetic field during the past 100 years" cited in Dr. de Jager's paper is erroneous according to Leif Svalgaard IIRC. <br /><br />What are the discrepancies between researchers on this based on, supporting and refuting? <br /><br />Thanks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-61396085769690196822011-06-20T09:19:16.564-07:002011-06-20T09:19:16.564-07:00It would seem that the anon from 7:48PM on June 20...It would seem that the anon from 7:48PM on June 20 does not understand the meaning of the word mechanism.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-87234551613245596292011-06-20T07:48:03.808-07:002011-06-20T07:48:03.808-07:00Another mechanism possibility:
solar magnetic act...Another mechanism possibility:<br /><br />solar magnetic activity affects earths magnetic field, which in turn adds volcanic activity and plate tectonics.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-78520005670705802872011-06-20T03:51:30.439-07:002011-06-20T03:51:30.439-07:00Does this mean the IPCC's AR5 will reflect the...Does this mean the IPCC's AR5 will reflect the wealth of studies that place greater emphasis on the sun and not Co2 as the key driver of climate change?<br /><br />With the existence of persuasive peer reviewed studies indicating that climate change appears to due, ultimately, to the sun, while a lack of empirical evidence proving Co2 is the key driver of catastrophic man-made global warming and climate change is still lacking, how will the IPCC maintain the credibility of its mantra?Mervyn Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00837085071317273800noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-3851920993464615212011-06-20T02:32:32.400-07:002011-06-20T02:32:32.400-07:00One mechanism which I have never seen discussed is...One mechanism which I have never seen discussed is the direct coupling of coronal currents in the sun into induced currents in the oceans coupled via the helio-geomagnetic transformer(s). Recent instrumental work has shown that the Spitzer resistivity is not the constant it was once thought to be and is in fact six orders of magnitude or so higher in flares and therefore very close to that of sea water. While resistivity isn't resistance such work does suggest the possibility that impedances could be more closely matched and by the maximum power transfer theorem there could be a more significant coupling of energy into the top few hundred meters (skin depth) of the oceans via this mechanism which would help buffer the climate through solar minima. However with lower solar activity and magnetic field strengths associated with grand minima this coupling would be reduced for long periods (polarity is also important). This would explain mini ice ages. A failing geomagnetic field such as we have now would eventually turn it off completely. This gives us a possible trigger for full scale glaciations (ice ages) which would begin at some point during the weakening of the geomagnetic field strength associated with excursions and flips. The fine trigger would in effect be the weaking solar magnetic field associated with periods of low solar activity.<br /><br />eco-geekAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com