tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post7742363631997835096..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: IPCC "Consensus" on Solar Influence was Only One Solar Physicist who Agreed with Her Own PaperUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-60232643065790492792011-06-18T05:02:07.916-07:002011-06-18T05:02:07.916-07:00Jack, a bottle blonde with no chest. You keep her ...Jack, a bottle blonde with no chest. You keep her mate.John of Cloverdale WA Australianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-74437116800585807102010-06-26T21:13:18.859-07:002010-06-26T21:13:18.859-07:00Through WUWT and Climate Audit, I criticized Lean&...Through WUWT and Climate Audit, I criticized Lean's work at its moment because she had changed her original database, based on proxies and sunspots together, to another database based only on sunspots. Lean’s first database, published by NOAA in 2001, showed a clear increase in the Sun’s radiation intensity in the last 400 years. However, her new graphs show a plain baseline which hides the increase of the amplitude of the solar activity. Her first database shows an amplitude of the solar activity of 3.3 W/m^2 with a minimum of 1363.4 W/m^2 in 1659, and a maximum of 1366.728 W/m^2 in 1981; on the other hand, her new database displays only 1.2 W/m^2 with a minimum in 1902 and a maximum in 1981. Obviously, the latter work by Judith Lean was damaged.Nasif Nahlehttp://www.biocab.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-48819862799971559782010-06-26T07:24:11.211-07:002010-06-26T07:24:11.211-07:00The sun doesn't effect climate or weather, nor...The sun doesn't effect climate or weather, nor does wind or clouds. The sun is there to power solar cells, and the wind is to power turbines when it is cloudy. The sun and wind are "new" and require subsidies to develop. Sailboats and clotheslines are "cutting edge, solar wind hybrids".CMChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05925505974743424900noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-70050394512636476192010-06-26T04:59:52.549-07:002010-06-26T04:59:52.549-07:00Thanks for reporting it. I hurried to write an Eng...Thanks for reporting it. I hurried to write an English tŕanslation of this Judith gate text, since it aroused so many attention, people bothered to toil through google translation editing.<br /><br />http://www.klimaskeptik.cz/english/<br /><br />and<br /><br />http://climatechange.thinkaboutit.eu/think2/post/judithgate_ipcc_consensus_was_only_one_solar_physicist<br /><br />V.Kremlik, klimaskeptik.czAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-53876286489256399712010-06-26T03:21:17.748-07:002010-06-26T03:21:17.748-07:00Just discovered this site from WUWT - thank you so...Just discovered this site from WUWT - thank you so much for all the useful daily data!!! WUWT has been somewhat off the pace lately. So - much appreciation - makes my life easier.<br /><br />And totally agree with this posting - indeed, I wrote a whole book about it!!! 'Chill: a reassessment of global warming theory' in which many of these graphs and the criticisms feature.Peter Taylorhttp://ethos-uk.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-89493987049698703522010-06-26T03:13:31.642-07:002010-06-26T03:13:31.642-07:00Certainly the cutest Solar Physicist I've ever...Certainly the cutest Solar Physicist I've ever seen. <br /><br />Maybe we can just let this slide?Jack Simmonsnoreply@blogger.com