tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post9167356463444623984..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: Why the basic global warming hypothesis is wrong; CO2 climate sensitivity exaggerated 21XUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-5357045853079200732016-01-06T01:11:52.611-08:002016-01-06T01:11:52.611-08:00Modulation of Ice Ages via Precession and Dust-Alb...Modulation of Ice Ages via Precession and Dust-Albedo Feedbacks<br />A new paper proving that CO2 is a minor player in the drama that is the Earth’s climate.<br /><br />(The article I produced has turned into a science paper).<br /><br />Abstract<br /><br />We present here a simple and novel proposal for the modulation and rhythm of ice ages and interglacials during the late Pleistocene. While the standard Milankovitch-precession theory fails to explain the long intervals between interglacials, these can be accounted for by a novel forcing and feedback system involving CO2, dust and albedo. During the glacial period, the high albedo of the northern ice sheets drives down global temperatures and CO2 concentrations, despite subsequent precessional forcing maxima. Over the following millennia CO2 is sequestered in the oceans and atmospheric concentrations eventually reach a critical minima of about 200 ppm, which causes a die-back of temperate and boreal forests and grasslands, especially at high altitude. The ensuing soil erosion generates dust storms, resulting in increased dust deposition and lower albedo on the northern ice sheets. As northern hemisphere insolation increases during the next Milankovitch cycle, the dust-laden ice-sheets absorb considerably more insolation and undergo rapid melting, which forces the climate into an interglacial period. The proposed mechanism is simple, robust, and comprehensive in its scope, and its key elements are well supported by empirical evidence.<br /><br />https://www.academia.edu/20051643/Modulation_of_Ice_Ages_via_Precession_and_Dust-Albedo_Feedbacks<br /><br />Sincerely,<br />Ralph EllisUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12680639258324088185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-10514538542153251932015-12-18T16:32:11.377-08:002015-12-18T16:32:11.377-08:00Ed, were you looking for fame? Good luck with th...Ed, were you looking for fame? Good luck with that. <br /><br />papertigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05233780822178325215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-52406387411605827942015-12-18T01:42:12.528-08:002015-12-18T01:42:12.528-08:00Very interesting article on corrections in the bas...Very interesting article on corrections in the basic global warming hypothesis.Wecohttp://www.wecointernational.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-51552353559417939712015-12-15T13:28:03.804-08:002015-12-15T13:28:03.804-08:00Engineering science demonstrates CO2, in spite of ...Engineering science demonstrates CO2, in spite of being a ghg, has no effect on climate. Identification of the two factors that do cause reported average global temperature change (sunspot number is the only independent variable) are at http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com (97% match since before 1900). Everything not explicitly included (such as aerosols, volcanos, non-condensing ghg, ice changes, uncertainty in measurements, heating from earth’s core, heat stored in ocean depths, etc.) must find room in the unexplained 3%.<br /><br />The last 500 million years of substantial CO2 with no sustained temperature change is compelling evidence CO2, in spite of being a ghg, has no effect on climate. This is documented in a peer reviewed paper at Energy & Environment, Volume 26, No. 5, 2015, 841-845 and also in the AGWunveiled document. Dan Pangburnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07898549182266117774noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-90673677647047680562015-11-27T21:29:35.933-08:002015-11-27T21:29:35.933-08:00Just one more stake in the heart of the AGW zombie...Just one more stake in the heart of the AGW zombie that refuses to die!<br /><br />As Mark Stoval alludes to above, it is as if the only thing now keeping the zombie alive is the effort from lukewarmers.<br /><br />gerannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-8508487290887728262015-11-22T10:43:09.025-08:002015-11-22T10:43:09.025-08:00Stop The Global Warming Swindel. Antarctic with ic...Stop The Global Warming Swindel. Antarctic with ice volume higher than average 1978-2010. No temperature increase since 1997. Polar bears 32000 six tinder population in 1950 5000 bears. Ocean level negligible well within Natural variations...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04310730817018349433noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-47142214258603418652015-11-22T03:04:50.444-08:002015-11-22T03:04:50.444-08:00And here is yet another important and illuminating...And here is yet another important and illuminating post. I can't understand how so many of our "luke-warm" friends can't see real skepticism of "CO2 warms the planet". I can see the politically motivated, rent-seeking alarmists not listening to truth, but why the luke-warmers?<br /><br />By the way, have you seen this one? "How AGW isn’t happening in the real Earth system" … by okulaer https://okulaer.wordpress.com/2015/11/15/how-agw-isnt-happening-in-the-real-earth-system/<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-55109229310269374492015-11-18T05:21:25.878-08:002015-11-18T05:21:25.878-08:00http://www.tech-know-group.com/papers/sensitivity....http://www.tech-know-group.com/papers/sensitivity.pdf<br />I put your suggestion in the stack model.<br />CONCLUSION: the sensitivity study with a variation of the lapse rate make too big variations necessary.<br />Forget it!jwreynen@aol.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-74151859135037679152015-11-16T00:25:03.440-08:002015-11-16T00:25:03.440-08:00This post does link to your post- simply click upo...This post does link to your post- simply click upon the title which is linked to your site. MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-80705551075947469492015-11-15T18:32:33.525-08:002015-11-15T18:32:33.525-08:00Not to complain, but I am surprised to see this we...Not to complain, but I am surprised to see this website copied my original post I did for Kimoto here: <br />http://edberry.com/blog/authors-climate/kyoji-kimoto/basic-global-warming-hypothesis-is-wrong/<br />without even the courtesy to link to the original. The copyright is Kyoji Kimoto's. I did a lot of formatting and editing for Kyoji Kimoto in order to make his post readable for reviewers.Ed Berryhttp://edberry.com/blog/authors-climate/kyoji-kimoto/basic-global-warming-hypothesis-is-wrong/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-63093624383243968612015-11-13T20:58:36.228-08:002015-11-13T20:58:36.228-08:00David Evans considers that the GCMs rely on the fl...David Evans considers that the GCMs rely on the flawed architecture of the basic model and are similarly flawed as a result.<br /><br />When one applies his revised architecture to both the basic model and the GCMs the issue of climate sensitivity to CO2 fades into insignificance.Stephen Wildehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07357171106480483956noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-4233214885308444552015-11-12T22:01:15.036-08:002015-11-12T22:01:15.036-08:00" Also, the Fukushima nuclear disaster might ..." Also, the Fukushima nuclear disaster might not have occurred without the Kyoto protocol that promoted nuclear power."<br /><br />What disaster?? There have been no deaths or illnesses from radiation sickness. There have been a large number of deaths from suicide by people uprooted and scared to death by radiation danger propaganda.<br /><br />Look into the results of Chernobyl, unquestionably the WORST nuclear disaster ever. The predictions were 10's to hundreds of thousands of deaths from radiation. The reality has been that they have only found about 6,000 deaths that can be reasonably ascribed to the radiation. The idea that the tiny amount of radiation spread around the world is causing deaths is ludicrous with the much higher levels locally having so few.<br /><br />Hormesis is a reality that mainstream needs to start accepting and Linear No Threshold assumptions are crap.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-81881118826268685512015-11-12T03:30:42.127-08:002015-11-12T03:30:42.127-08:00As Tony Heller has pointed out, NASA scientists de...As Tony Heller has pointed out, NASA scientists declared already in 1971 that runaway greenhouse effect due to CO2 is not possible:<br /><br />http://realclimatescience.com/2015/11/nasa-has-known-since-1971-that-co2-is-not-dangerous-yet-lied-to-the-public-continuously/<br /><br />somehow, they seem to have forgotten that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-76738847262892606762015-11-12T03:30:11.407-08:002015-11-12T03:30:11.407-08:00Abive my head - regardless, it is off message, so ...Abive my head - regardless, it is off message, so will be ignored. I have to keep reminding myself that the climate is simply a battle in a much larger war between control freaks and free thinkers. Elby the Beserkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15060519682739666145noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-57868089231439661022015-11-11T14:28:21.891-08:002015-11-11T14:28:21.891-08:00This provides a more detailed description of the e...This provides a more detailed description of the effect of lapse rate variability:<br /><br />http://joannenova.com.au/2015/10/for-discussion-can-convection-neutralize-the-effect-of-greenhouse-gases/Stephen Wildehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07357171106480483956noreply@blogger.com