tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post1108751842858185599..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: Experimental results support cosmic ray theory of climateUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-62246005797343205562015-11-11T09:27:08.626-08:002015-11-11T09:27:08.626-08:00But carbon dioxide IS a natural component of the e...But carbon dioxide IS a natural component of the earth. Without it our earth would be a dead planet.Besides, where did all the CO2 come from that allowed all the plants to grow during the Carbonaceous Epoch? The plants that were compressed into coal grew as a result of many times the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere that we have today. By burning coal we're simply releasing the natural CO2 from that Epoch back into the atmosphere. What could be more natural?Rabeladhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18391107244478116852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-9222262409166759002013-11-15T20:46:55.946-08:002013-11-15T20:46:55.946-08:00http://www.klimatupplysningen.se/2013/11/03/svensm...http://www.klimatupplysningen.se/2013/11/03/svensmark-om-clouds-senaste-experiment/MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-35216757901753956782011-05-18T06:56:20.379-07:002011-05-18T06:56:20.379-07:00The chief scientific advisor to the UK government ...The chief scientific advisor to the UK government has publicly stated that "we have not been able to prove that global warming is caused by natural phenomena therefore it must be carbon dioxide". How much more damning can that be for the AGW proponents.Danielnoreply@blogger.com