tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post1446054150170254474..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: Collapse of the AGW theory of the IPCC; 'Most influential climate paper of all time' contains multiple false assumptionsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-52558271775595136402015-12-02T05:57:56.867-08:002015-12-02T05:57:56.867-08:00I have just read for papers, sensitivity.pdf and s...I have just read for papers, sensitivity.pdf and sensitivity_overview.pdf. I was greatly impressed. You insights and logic are refreshing. <br /><br />Thank you for that. <br /><br />I look forward to reading your other papers.<br />Sensei Mitchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17139500666718123583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-62033509739003208302015-11-21T20:03:59.040-08:002015-11-21T20:03:59.040-08:00The following two papers deal with the suggestion ...The following two papers deal with the suggestion to consider a variation of the lapse rate in sensitivity studies<br />http://www.tech-know-group.com/papers/surface_emission.pdf<br />http://www.tech-know-group.com/papers/sensitivity.pdfjwreynen@aol.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-8910588496461022602015-07-19T10:59:14.237-07:002015-07-19T10:59:14.237-07:00Thanks cementafriend, looking forward to your furt...Thanks cementafriend, looking forward to your further thoughts on Kimoto's papers, etc. MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-61537226463713215752015-07-19T03:25:19.776-07:002015-07-19T03:25:19.776-07:00You are probably right about the influence of the ...You are probably right about the influence of the Manabe& Wetherald 1967. it is a reference in the book "The Physics of the Atmosphere" 1977 by John T Houghton who was Director of the UK Meteorological Office and had a large influence on the IPCC from its foundation. The book has been part of reference material for some "Climate Science"( sic) courses at Universities (2nd rate?) and other institutions.<br />The book contains information that is incorrect. It appears that some parts may have been plagiarized with no reference to the source or understanding of the point for inclusion ie not further elaborated (eg 1.4 Adiabatic lapse rate or 9.1 The Reynolds Number). The book demonstrates that the author has a poor or no understanding of engineering (science) or the engineering subjects of heat&mass transfer, fluid dynamics or thermodynamics.<br />I will read the Kimoto papers with interest and thoroughly.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-15620526520866719322015-07-18T11:12:28.013-07:002015-07-18T11:12:28.013-07:00Excellent. A critical review of all Manabe's ...Excellent. A critical review of all Manabe's work is in order. This is a good start.<br />JShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08534451304039918947noreply@blogger.com