tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post2677824662707309046..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: Rapid rise in CO2 causes much less warmingUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-63930584942959221972011-07-17T10:25:19.773-07:002011-07-17T10:25:19.773-07:00fantasy island antarctica +13 C and +32 C
Svea E...fantasy island antarctica +13 C and +32 C <br /> Svea Ep6 (Antarctica)<br />Latitude: 74-28S Longitude: 011-31W Altitude: 0 m.<br />http://www.ogimet.com/cgi-bin/gsynres?lang=en&ind=89018&ano=2011&mes=7&day=17&hora=12&min=0&ndays=30<br />Straight up lies- yes the government <br />is lying as it always does.<br /><br />vs<br /><br />reality minus 50 C<br />Kohnen Ep9 (Antarctica)<br />Latitude: 75-00S Longitude: 000-00E Altitude: 0 m.<br />http://www.ogimet.com/cgi-bin/gsynres?lang=en&ind=89507&ano=2011&mes=7&day=17&hora=12&min=0&ndays=30<br />http://www.ogimet.com/cgi-bin/gsynop?lang=en&zona=antartida&base=bluem&proy=orto&ano=2011&mes=07&day=17&hora=12&vtn=Tn&Send=send<br /><br />ALL data is government fudgedfiltered--<br />Of course the warmer temperatures <br />will be recorded and the <br />colder temperatures will be discarded.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-10877175256266788662011-07-14T15:56:07.947-07:002011-07-14T15:56:07.947-07:00Anonymous,
"Venus likely underwent a runaway...Anonymous,<br /><br />"Venus likely underwent a runaway or “moist greenhouse” phase associated with rapid water loss and very high temperatures."<br /><br />Didn't your mommy teach you that SPECULATION is not fact?? There are no FACTS to allow us to assume that there was a lot of water on Venus. There are also no FACTS to allow us to assume that even if there was a lot of water that it could cause your runaway greenhouse fantasy.<br /><br />By the way, Venus is COOLING!! It emits more energy than it takes in. Apparently all that CO2 only affects a couple narrow windows of emissions and the rest of the window is wide open. One other misunderstanding to clear up is that the total sum of "greenhouse" on Venus is caused by the heavy Sulphur cloud layer that, unlike the CO2, REFLECTS IR.<br /><br />There, don't you feel better? No worries on the earth, except for that minor issue of cooling because the sun has decided to ignore the Consensus Scientists and do what it does which is VARY its output.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-67061937716302160632011-07-14T15:44:53.143-07:002011-07-14T15:44:53.143-07:00Anonymous,
Explain why, as Harry Dale Huffman sho...Anonymous,<br /><br />Explain why, as Harry Dale Huffman shows, the P vs T curves between Venus (almost 97% CO2) and Earth (.039 % CO2) are essentially identical.<br /><br />The high temperature of Venus is due to the much higher pressures, not CO2, and this P/T relationship holds for other planets as well.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-2474025186222383442011-07-14T14:56:19.881-07:002011-07-14T14:56:19.881-07:00You're brilliance is only superceded by your m...You're brilliance is only superceded by your modesty. Put yourself forward for a Nobel prize. But before you do - you may wish to read up on the basics before misinforming others:<br />Venus likely underwent a runaway or “moist greenhouse” phase associated with rapid water loss and very high temperatures. Once water is gone, silicate weathering reactions that draw down CO2 from the atmosphere are insignificant, and CO2 can then build up to very high values. Today, a dense CO2 atmosphere keeps Venus extremely hot.http://www.skepticalscience.com/Venus-runaway-greenhouse-effect.htmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-60413513031532084612011-07-13T04:43:46.791-07:002011-07-13T04:43:46.791-07:00Sorry, but the definitive evidence that increasing...Sorry, but the definitive evidence that increasing CO2 does NOT warm (nor cool) the atmosphere is, and always will be, the comparison of temperatures in the atmospheres of Venus (with 96.5% CO2) and Earth (0.04% CO2):<br /><br /><a href="http://theendofthemystery.blogspot.com/2010/11/venus-no-greenhouse-effect.html" rel="nofollow">Venus: No Greenhouse Effect</a><br /><br />The whole climate consensus is a house of cards, all of it resting on the single point of the "greenhouse effect", which the Venus/Earth data proves is a false hypothesis. This data is nearly 20 years old, and any first-year physics student would be expected to analyze it properly and easily, yet I am apparently the first scientist to do so, and the only scientist to recognize and remain focused upon this, the critical knowledge that should end all competent debate (those that do not focus upon it, once having seen my presentation of it, are only engaging in incompetent debate). Not only does it prove 1) there is NO CO2 greenhouse effect as promulgated by the IPCC and the "consensus", but it also shows 2) the planetary atmospheres are heated by direct absorption of infrared radiation from the Sun, not by first warming of the planetary surface (and not by visible radiation) as most scientists believe, 3) consensus science is wrong to treat the planetary surface as a blackbody, and 4) albedo has nothing to do with the equivalent blackbody temperature of a planet-with-atmosphere system (only the incident solar radiation defines that equivalent temperature). My simple presentation also indicates what should be easy for students of thermodynamics to understand, if they were not miseducated to believe unquestioningly in the "greenhouse effect" dogma: The real effect of increasing CO2 is to increase the efficiency (thus the speed) of heat transfer within the atmosphere, without changing the observed temperature lapse rate structure of the atmosphere; and again, Venus provides confirmation of this effect, because with 96.5% CO2, its dark side is found to be just as hot as its sunlit side. This is all very clear and simple, yet people still argue over the supposed exact value of the CO2 "climate sensitivity", and convoluted reasoning such as in the report posted above. Everyone should be clamoring for my findings to be front-page news, worldwide, and in every related scientific journal, to correct the false consensus that continues to miseducate students of science, throughout the world, and underwrites the IPCC political agenda, which has become obviously tyrannical to the people of the world.Harry Dale Huffmanhttp://theendofthemystery.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.com