tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post5151975888162106187..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: Professor Don Easterbrook on The Looming Threat of Global CoolingUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-56767391919953083412013-12-23T15:33:23.314-08:002013-12-23T15:33:23.314-08:00Doesn't change any of the claims or conclusion...Doesn't change any of the claims or conclusions of the post or Easterbrook's analysis whatsoever. "Forged" is, once again, ridiculous.MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-29624335250550313132013-12-23T15:13:56.401-08:002013-12-23T15:13:56.401-08:00"Misplaced"?! One arrow by chance - a v..."Misplaced"?! One arrow by chance - a very small maybe. Two arrows "misplaced" and a third inserted at the wrong position? With a false claim? Deliberately forged - with one possible different explanation: the maker of this graph just has absolutely no clue what he or she is doing - sending this graph to the bin anyway.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-52490153525820699072013-12-21T09:03:08.435-08:002013-12-21T09:03:08.435-08:00http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/12/29/don-easterbr...http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/12/29/don-easterbrooks-agu-paper-on-potential-global-cooling/MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-65517143159767693082013-12-20T11:30:55.352-08:002013-12-20T11:30:55.352-08:00Oh please, the LIA arrow is a bit misplaced, but s...Oh please, the LIA arrow is a bit misplaced, but so what? The LIA ended in 1850 and the present global warming arrow is correct. Doesn't change any of the conclusions of the post or Easterbrook's analysis. "Forged" is, once again, ridiculous.<br /><br />Here's a blowup of the ice core data for natural climate change deniers such as yourself:<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uif1NwcUgMUMShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-14235474542746472522013-12-20T10:51:16.684-08:002013-12-20T10:51:16.684-08:00Please look at the original - there is an arrow a...Please look at the original - there is an arrow at the right side of the graph, just at the last bit, named "Little Ice Age" In the forged graph this very part is re-labeled "Present global warming". Labels of a graph dont get moved around and misleading labels dont appear by chance. Yes, deliberately forged. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-78537696467691238062013-12-17T14:02:26.198-08:002013-12-17T14:02:26.198-08:00"forged" is ridiculous, credit is given ..."forged" is ridiculous, credit is given to the data source from the GISP ice core, the data from which is not owned by Richard AlleyMShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-85066217870848292762013-12-17T13:56:03.042-08:002013-12-17T13:56:03.042-08:00nice Graph! but with a small downside: It is forge...nice Graph! but with a small downside: It is forged from this original<br /><br />http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/alley2000/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com