tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post5342983147795465341..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: Author admits the blade of the new bogus hockey-stick is not statistically significantUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-72519377531351976852013-04-18T08:40:04.606-07:002013-04-18T08:40:04.606-07:00No he didn't, and in fact did many media inter...No he didn't, and in fact did many media interviews hyping the "unprecedented" bogus blade without ever once telling the media it was not statistically significant. A new member of the climate scientist Hall of Shame.MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-45738857284952109332013-04-18T05:51:46.692-07:002013-04-18T05:51:46.692-07:00If he'd WANTED to say "data presented in ...If he'd WANTED to say "data presented in this paper covering the last 100 years has any statistical significance and no conclusions about recent posited global warming should be inferred from these results" he would have. But, of course, he didn't, did he?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-33134476800019057152013-03-18T08:34:17.154-07:002013-03-18T08:34:17.154-07:00They have similar meanings...
"Robust statis...They have similar meanings...<br /><br />"Robust statistical methods" are used to determine if a finding is "statistically significant"MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-37804055213399453932013-03-17T03:36:10.925-07:002013-03-17T03:36:10.925-07:00does "robust" mean the same thing as &qu...does "robust" mean the same thing as "statistically significant" in strict statistical language?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-686740584349562642013-03-14T02:48:23.916-07:002013-03-14T02:48:23.916-07:00Thanks, post correctedThanks, post correctedMShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-61222295725237431732013-03-14T02:34:33.314-07:002013-03-14T02:34:33.314-07:00Paragraph 4 actually says "o.6 degrees greate...Paragraph 4 actually says "o.6 degrees greater warming"<br /><br />Not less warming.<br /><br />A "convenient" typo from the authors, I suspect, so not to draw attention to the magic algoritmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-68876070287009992662013-03-14T01:23:00.380-07:002013-03-14T01:23:00.380-07:00Exactly, Marcott hides the truth in gobbledygook i...Exactly, Marcott hides the truth in gobbledygook in the paper, while now stating to Steve McIntyre that "we clearly state in paragraph 4 of the manuscript that the reconstruction over the past 60 yrs before present (the years 1890 − 1950 CE) is probably not robust." Amazing the lengths to which these fraudsters perpetuate the AGW scam.MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-83380020871816926272013-03-14T00:32:32.881-07:002013-03-14T00:32:32.881-07:00The subtlety here is that Paragraph 4
Seems to be ...The subtlety here is that Paragraph 4<br />Seems to be speaking to "differences" thus<br />Disguising it from what he'd now underscore:<br />The infilling, data, and rise are a bust.<br /><br />He's talking to Steve McIntyre to cover<br />His hindquarters on how that blade got up-bended<br />But his actual code we have yet to discover<br />We strongly suspect that the choice was intended.<br /><br />===|==============/ Keith DeHavelleKeith DeHavellehttp://www.dehavelle.comnoreply@blogger.com