tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post6699846394008773788..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: New paper finds .8C global cooling during Dalton Minimum, same magnitude as 20th century warmingUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-46018251368884216492014-12-16T01:10:04.045-08:002014-12-16T01:10:04.045-08:00"Reduction of irradiance at λ > 250 nm lea..."Reduction of irradiance at λ > 250 nm leads to a significant (up to 2%) decrease in the ocean heat content (OHC) between 0 and 300 m in depth, whereas the changes in irradiance at λ < 250 nm or in energetic particles have virtually no effect."<br /><br />Would it be possible to clarify what this sentence is indicating, please? What, specifically, are "energetic particles," and what is being distinguished as having "virtually no effect"? Thanks!Kenneth Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00198431792165032103noreply@blogger.com