tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post7558379505133911006..comments2024-03-11T04:54:26.827-07:00Comments on THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: New paper shows IPCC underestimates global cooling from man-made aerosols/clouds by factor of 27 timesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-36264358953028578272014-06-23T19:22:49.718-07:002014-06-23T19:22:49.718-07:00It does remind me as well, TSN. They will use thi...It does remind me as well, TSN. They will use this data to promote all the heavy metals such as barium oxide and aluminum oxide from the chemtrails where to save us from global warming death. It was for our own good! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-84796889779625288682014-06-22T12:24:28.984-07:002014-06-22T12:24:28.984-07:00All this discussion about aerosols reminds me of (...All this discussion about aerosols reminds me of (dare I say it) "chemtrails". Hypernucleation of atmosphere drives drought and drives the GHG, water vapor to cause less rain and increased surface temps. We saw it happen over the Pacific to force drought in California to out pressure on food and water resources as if insiders are wagering on commodity futures.Town Square Newshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08626998583513082262noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-68183302378737916852014-06-11T08:59:58.262-07:002014-06-11T08:59:58.262-07:00No
1. Would require GHG forcing to be ridiculousl...No<br /><br />1. Would require GHG forcing to be ridiculously high ~12W/m2 higher than IPCC currently estimates.<br />2. The entire radiative forcing concept is wrong. The greenhouse effect is due to gravity, atmospheric mass, pressure as established in several other posts. The troposphere is in radiative/convective equilibrium set by solar insolation & atmospheric mass/gravity/lapse rate, not greenhouse gas concentrations. MShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06714540297202434542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-3763387282285058422014-06-11T01:57:33.140-07:002014-06-11T01:57:33.140-07:00if true, CS will be on the higher end of the estim...if true, CS will be on the higher end of the estimates.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06809712374001740120noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142988674703954802.post-13385782961673676492014-06-10T17:44:12.752-07:002014-06-10T17:44:12.752-07:00"According to a new paper published in Scienc..."According to a new paper published in Science, the global cooling effect of clouds nucleated by man-made aerosols since the beginning of the industrial revolution is approximately 15 watts per square meter, which is about 27 times more cooling effect than the mean estimate published in the 2014 IPCC AR5 Report:"<br /><br />Sounds to me like they are going to use this 'science' to say that the CO2 induced warming would be a lot worse if it wasn't for these pesky aerosols.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com