Thursday, March 22, 2012

IPCC Expert Dr. Vincent Gray: 'There is not a scrap of evidence in any IPCC reports that human emissions of CO2 have any harmful effect on the climate'

Excerpts from a posting today by IPCC Expert Reviewer and climate scientist Dr. Vincent Gray:

Nobody seems to realise that the most elaborate and comprehensive conflict of interest that has been inflicted on the public is the "Global Warning" Theory.

I have been an Expert Reviewer on every one of the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and I can tell you that there is not a scrap of evidence in any of them that human emissions of carbon dioxide have any harmful effect on the climate.

How have they got away with it?

Attempts to "simulate" their unreliable and manipulated past climate "data" have been failures, yet are claimed as successes, But even if the "data" were genuine and the simulation successful it does not prove anything. Correlation, however convincing is not evidence of causation. The only way you can demonstrate the success of any theory is successful prediction  of future climate over the whole range it is intended to be used, to a satisfactory level of accuracy. This has already been done with Newton's Laws of motion and Darwin's theories of evolution. It has not been done with the "global warming" theory. There has been no successful attempt to predict any future climate event. They do not even pretend they can do it, as they only provide "projections" from their models, not "predictions": .

How have they persuaded us that they are able to predict future climate?

They operate a system called "attribution". This is a combination of "simulation" (correlation), and "assessment" by "experts".  The "experts" are all paid to provide the models that they are assessing. These assessments are therefore an elaborate and comprehensive  conflict of interest.

They apply a whole series of "likelihoods" to each "assessment" and apply a fake "statistical significance" which, unlike those normally applied to genuine science, have no background of actual experimental observations.

I attach the official list of instructions on how to perpetrate this elaborate fraud on the international community, from the Fourth IPCC Report.

Vincent Gray
Wellington 6035

"To kill an error is as good a service as, and sometimes better than, the establishing of a new truth or fact"   Charles Darwin

Attachment: AR4 Uncertainy Guidance Notes (pdf) 


  1. Thanks Dr. Gray.

    You were being too kind to the IPCC.

    I signed the Oregon Petition 6 years ago. An eighth grader could see GW is a fraud in just 20 minutes on the internet. CO2 is only 3% of the total GHG, and 97% of that is from all natural sources. The average CO2 of Earth has been 1250 ppm and, at only 389 ppm today, we are at one of the all time low periods going back 500 million years. And many, many, more such astonishing contradictions to the IPCC GW mongering claims to count or mention here further.

    Most disturbing, is the ongoing repression of the real science and data and it very much reminds me of the Aryan "Science" done by the Nazis -- and I am not trying to overstate it or be dramatic. Insofar as there is a huge political control agenda tied to GW, I wonder just how far they may actually go. It would seem they have no limits. None.


  2. The earth's orbit around the sun is destabilizing: