Note the spikes corresponding to El Nino years in 1983, 1987, 1995, (very strong) 1998, 2002, and 2006.
The IPCC AR4 guesstimates of temperature change due to a doubling of CO2 greenhouse gases ("climate sensitivity") range from 2-4.5 degrees. Other authors estimate much less sensitivity of temperature due to a doubling of CO2 levels, some close to zero statistical significance, as noted in the graph below of temperature sensitivity to doubling of CO2 as a function of reference period:
The IPCC AR4 guesstimates of temperature change due to a doubling of CO2 greenhouse gases ("climate sensitivity") range from 2-4.5 degrees. Other authors estimate much less sensitivity of temperature due to a doubling of CO2 levels, some close to zero statistical significance, as noted in the graph below of temperature sensitivity to doubling of CO2 as a function of reference period:
also see the August 2009 paper by Lindzen and Choi which uses satellite data to determine climate sensitivity at 0.5 degrees due to a doubling of CO2 (that's 6 times less than the IPCC best estimate of 3 degrees). And see here.
References:
Shaviv, N.J., 2005. On climate response to changes in the cosmic ray flux and radiative budget. J. Geophys. Res. 110, A08105. see On Climate Sensitivity and why it is probably small
Douglass, David H, B. David Clader, and R.S. Knox , 2004, Climate sensitivity of Earth to solar irradiance: update. Physics, abstract physics/0411002. http://citebase.eprints.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai:arXiv.org:physics/0411002
Douglass, David H, B. David Clader, and R.S. Knox , 2004, Climate sensitivity of Earth to solar irradiance: update. Physics, abstract physics/0411002. http://citebase.eprints.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai:arXiv.org:physics/0411002
Stephen E. Schwartz, 2007, Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth's climate system, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S05, doi:10.1029/2007JD008746
Chylek P., U. Lohmann, M. Dubey, M. Mishchenko, R. Kahn, and A. Ohmura, 2007: Limits on climate sensitivity derived from recent satellite and surface observations. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S04, doi:10.1029/2007JD008740.
Petr Chylek & Ulrike Lohmann, 2008, Aerosol radiative forcing and climate sensitivity deduced from the Last Glacial Maximum to Holocene transition, Geophysical Research Letters, VOL. 35, L04804, doi:10.1029/2007GL032759
Ok, but what about the time to double the pre-industrial level, which was about 280ppm? From what I understand, that is what the vast majority of the literature is discussing.
ReplyDeletewell even that is highly questionable... take a look at spielclimate.blogspot.com scroll down to bottom of page, click read more, and look at refs under CO2
ReplyDeletealso this:
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2010/01/other-hockey-stick-co2-levels-part-2.html
96% of CO2 rise is due to natural processes like volcanos & degassing from the oceans:
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2010/01/co2-levels-in-atmosphere-are-damped-by.html
also see:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091230184221.htm