Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Good Science Gets Its Revenge

In a New York Times article published today, taxpayer-supported nutter-blogger-in-chief at Gavin A. Schmidt is quoted as follows:

But some scientists said that responding to climate change skeptics was a fool’s errand.
Climate scientists are paid to do climate science,” said Gavin A. Schmidt, a senior climatologist with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies. “Their job is not persuading the public.”
He said that the recent flurry of hostility to climate science had been driven as much by the cold winter as by any real or perceived scientific sins.“There have always been people accusing us of being fraudulent criminals, of the I.P.C.C. being corrupt,” Dr. Schmidt said. “What is new is this paranoia combined with a spell of cold weather in the United States and the ‘climategate’ release. It’s a perfect storm that has allowed the nutters to control the agenda.”
The answer is simple, he said.
“Good science,” he said, “is the best revenge.”
I fully agree with Gavin's last quote, that good science is the best revenge. Let's take a look at this in action, from the recently released NASA FOIA files part 4 is a series of emails detailing a trouncing by 3 scathing reviews of a paper written by Gavin Schmidt et al submitted not once but twice to BAMS (the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society) and ultimately rejected outright. Followed by this are emails regarding a blog posting at in 2009 stating "prominent scientist appalled by Gavin Schmidt's lack of knowledge". Looks like Gavin better just stick to persuading the public at his blog rather than being paid to do climate science.

The Truth About



  1. Why is the New York Times destroying it's reputation? Propaganda from Gore Sunday, propagand from Schmidt on Wednesday. It is a clearinghouse for delusionists.

  2. In Gavin's defence, he was quick and accurate when correcting the Antarctic temp data from AWS station "Harry".
    Valuable contribution to science, well worth whatever amount the taxpayer is paying GISS for his services.

    Oh wait. He stole that info off a rival blogger.

    Maybe we can get a refund?

  3. papertiger: thanks for that link - hilarious

    we're not only due a refund but a judgment for fraud IMHO