According to the paper, "although most climate models agree on a general increase in future precipitation in the Northern Hemisphere due to higher temperatures, no consensus has yet been reached on how this warming will perturb flooding rates." The authors find however, "Despite an anticipated increase in Pw [winter precipitation], the paleodata, nevertheless, suggest that we are likely to witness a decrease in future floods 50–100 years from now because the accompanying warming will cancel that net effect of a wetter regime." The paper adds to many other peer-reviewed papers finding flooding is more common during cold periods, such as the Little Ice Age [LIA] and Dark Ages Cold Period [DACP].
Scandinavian floods: From past observations to future trends
Highlights
- •
- Winter precipitation and floods are linked on longer time scales.
- •
- Wetter winter regimes in mountainous areas produce more floods.
- •
- Future warming is likely to reduce the number of floods.
Abstract
Although most climate models agree on a general increase in future precipitation in the Northern Hemisphere due to higher temperatures, no consensus has yet been reached on how this warming will perturb flooding rates. Here we examine the potential co-variability between winter precipitation (Pw) and floods on millennial time scales. This is accomplished by analyzing reconstructed Pw from five records in Scandinavia, which is, compared to data from two high-resolution flood records from southern Norway. These Holocene records reveal a positive correlation (R2 = 0.41, p > 0.01) between the number of floods and Pw [winter precipitation] on centennial time scales over the last 6000 years. Future projections for Pw over central Scandinavia for the next 100 years suggest a continued increase in Pw that approximates maximum Holocene precipitation values. Despite an anticipated increase in Pw [winter precipitation], the paleodata, nevertheless, suggest that we are likely to witness a decrease in future floods 50–100 years from now because the accompanying warming will cancel that net effect of a wetter regime.
In the episode with Pastor Joyner, it was the pastor who behaved more like Feynman's ideal scientist and not the producers of this documentary.
ReplyDeleteRead my critique posted here http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/05/06/years-of-living-dangerously-pastor-rick-joyner-models-feynmans-ideal-scientist/
In another episode they basely exploited human tragedy from fires, and it was based on one study that runs contrary to most of what fire ecologists know. I have worked to promote wise environmental stewardship in the Sierra Nevada and nearly lost our university research station to a human set forest fire. To study the regions ecology we must be very aware of the true nature of forest fires and this documentary is misleading. I posted my essay on the deceptive presentation on WUWT
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/04/25/years-of-living-dangerously-shouts-climate-fire-but-data-says-their-shouting-is-simply-noise/
Thanks Jim I've appreciated your articles at WUWT
ReplyDelete