According to the authors, however,
"A different mechanism is important at longer timescales (1960s-present) over which the [natural] Southern Annular Mode trended upwards. In this period, increased ocean heat uptake has largely arisen from reduced heat loss associated with reduced winds over the Agulhas Return Current and southward displacement of Southern Ocean westerlies."
Surface warming hiatus caused by increased heat uptake across multiple ocean basins
S. S. Drijfhout
The first decade of the twenty-first century was characterised by a hiatus in global surface warming. Using ocean model hindcasts and reanalyses we show that heat uptake between the 1990s and 2000s increased by 0.7 ± 0.3Wm−2. Approximately 30% of the increase is associated with colder sea surface temperatures in the eastern Pacific. Other basins contribute via reduced heat loss to the atmosphere, in particular the Southern and subtropical Indian Oceans (30%), and the subpolar North Atlantic (40%). A different mechanism is important at longer timescales (1960s-present) over which the Southern Annular Mode trended upwards. In this period, increased ocean heat uptake has largely arisen from reduced heat loss associated with reduced winds over the Agulhas Return Current and southward displacement of Southern Ocean westerlies.
Don't knock this reason.
ReplyDeleteThe warming recorded between the mid-1970's and 2000 was the result of the opposite phase of the same oceanic oscillations that flip from cooling to warming to cooling again. The hiatus is the beginning of a cooling period.
The warming between 1975 and 2000 was caused by natural oceanic oscillations and has been misinterpreted by alarmists as having been caused by CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions.
This is a natural mechanism that answers the argument from ignorance: Well if the warming is not caused by mankind, what causes it? We can't find any explanation so it must be AGW.
I'm not knocking this explanation, just knocking any suggestion that AGW has anything to do with increased heat loss in one region and decreased heat loss in another region. Natural ocean oscillations are entirely consistent with such patterns, not AGW.
DeleteYes, I know you are not knocking it. That was for my fellow-followers of your blog.
Delete#59 - We lied! It was for the greater good , and OUR$
ReplyDelete