[Illustrations, footnotes and references available in PDF version]
Excerpts:
Controversy abounds over the temperature history of the earth, particularly that of the past one to two millennia. The original debate was sparked by the papers of Mann et al. (1998, 1999), which challenged the long-accepted view that there was nothing unusual about earth's climatic history subsequent to the inception of the Industrial Revolution; and it prompted the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to disavow their original representation of the temperature history of the Holocene (Houghton et al., 1990), where several periods of time prior to the inception of the Industrial Revolution were depicted as having experienced temperatures that were higher than those of the latter part of the 20th century.
Controversy abounds over the temperature history of the earth, particularly that of the past one to two millennia. The original debate was sparked by the papers of Mann et al. (1998, 1999), which challenged the long-accepted view that there was nothing unusual about earth's climatic history subsequent to the inception of the Industrial Revolution; and it prompted the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to disavow their original representation of the temperature history of the Holocene (Houghton et al., 1990), where several periods of time prior to the inception of the Industrial Revolution were depicted as having experienced temperatures that were higher than those of the latter part of the 20th century.
For a considerable amount of time during the Medieval Warm Period, this large chunk of China enjoyed greater warmth than has yet to be experienced in modern times during the winter season.
The cyclical nature of the millennial-scale oscillation of climate that is evident in both climate records further suggests that there is no need to invoke rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations as a cause of the development of the Modern Warm Period.
From 1890 to 1950, another warm and dry period held sway, followed by a cooling since the end of the 1940s, which is at odds with the hockeystick temperature history of Mann et al. (1998, 1999).
In conclusion, the results of these several studies demonstrate that the so-called unprecedented warmth of the late 20th century is simply a myth, as far as China is concerned. The apparent great warmth of this period in this particular part of the world appears to have been but a common manifestation of naturally-induced and regularly-recurring conditions similar to those that have been experienced in prior millennia. These results also serve as a testimony against those who would deny the existence of an extensive (hemispheric or global) Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age, as well as an extensive Roman Warm Period and Dark Ages Cold Period, and cyclical climate changes in general. Clearly, it's time for everyone to wake up! ... and to recognize the dynamic nature of real-world climate change!
No comments:
Post a Comment