Monday, January 28, 2013

New paper says warmer winters cause less & more flu


More Severe Flu Seasons Predicted Due to Climate Change


Research by ASU scientists tracked the number of flu cases by week for the past 16 years. Their studies suggest there is a trend toward earlier and more severe flu seasons with potential link climate change. (Credit: Image courtesy of Arizona State University College of Liberal Arts and Sciences)
Jan. 28, 2013 — The American public can expect to add earlier and more severe flu seasons to the fallout from climate change, according to a research study published online Jan. 28 in PLOS Currents: Influenza.

A team of scientists led by Sherry Towers, research professor in the Mathematical, Computational and Modeling Sciences Center at Arizona State University, studied waves of influenza and climate patterns in the U.S. from the 1997-1998 season to the present.

The team's analysis, which used Centers for Disease Control data, indicates a pattern for both A and B strains: warm winters are usually followed by heavy flu seasons.

"It appears that fewer people contract influenza during warm winters, and this causes a major portion of the population to remain vulnerable into the next season, causing an early and strong emergence," says Towers. "And when a flu season begins exceptionally early, much of the population has not had a chance to get vaccinated, potentially making that flu season even worse."

The current flu season, which is still in high gear in parts of the nation, began early and fiercely. It followed a relatively light 2011-2012 season, which saw the lowest peak of flu since tracking efforts went into effect, and coincided with the fourth warmest winter on record. According to previous studies, flu transmission decreases in warm or humid conditions.

If global warming continues, warm winters will become more common, and the impact of flu will likely be more heavily felt, say the study's authors.

Mathematical epidemiologist Gerardo Chowell-Puente, an associate professor in the School of Human Evolution and Social Change in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, adds that the findings could inform preparedness efforts following mild winters: "The expedited manufacture and distribution of vaccines and aggressive vaccination programs could significantly diminish the severity of future influenza epidemics."

The goal of the overarching study is to better grasp the character and trajectory of influenza in all its forms. The study was partially supported by the Multinational Influenza Seasonal Mortality Study, overseen by the National Institutes of Health's Fogarty International Center. Other team members are Rasheed Hameed, Matthew Jastrebski, Maryam Khan, Jonathan Meeks, Anuj Mubayi and George Harris of Northeastern Illinois University.

3 comments:

  1. You are kidding me. This is like studying the mortgage market from the end of WWII through 2005 and concluding there was no significant risk of defaults spreading around the country. Conveniently leaving out the Great Depression. This study is using far to little to conclude anything.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another fine example of taxpayer dollars at work for the AGW religion.

      Delete
  2. Most of the scientists' names I can't even pronounce. Did they bother studying the STRAINS of flu and the rates of mutation? Gene coding? Anything that actually has to do with virology?

    I saw this on "The Doctors", where they blamed the flu on climate change. Already the title seems inconclusive and even unsure. The purpose of studies is to reveal something meaningful, but it's obvious these guys have no idea what they're talking about!

    Did they even consult virologists? Viruses like warmth, yet are more severe in the cold weather, hence why they spread from person to person due to close proximity. Not to mention the severity of viruses also depends on a group of people...which calls for unorthodox - IOW "racist" testing. All of this has little to do with AGW.

    The study never found anything and constantly refutes itself. What a waste of money and science.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.