Friday, September 6, 2013

Climate scam artists now altering Arctic sea ice data to look alarming

First, they altered the temperature record to look more alarming by adjusting pre-satellite era temperatures down and post-satellite era temperatures up:

The Goddard institute for Space Studies caught red handed. Temps Adjustment DOWN pre sat era, UP since -Joe Bastardi [& Steven Goddard] H/T Tom Nelson



Now, just as Arctic Sea ice is about to hit the minimum, they've altered the sea ice extent satellite record to look more alarming by significantly lowering the minimum. For double shame!


September 6, 2013 Reblogged from Sunshine Hours:

Jaxa Version 2 – Make The Low Even Lower (and the Great Big Con continues)




Jaxa is one of the other sea ice monitoring agencies. They just came out with a version 2 of their data.

I thought … why not graph the difference between version 1 and version 2 for 2013.

Red = Version 2 Lower Than Version 1

Blue = Version 2 Higher Than Version 1

Guess what the following graph shows? It makes the minimum dramatically lower (400,000 sq km lower) and the maximum higher so the minimum looks even worse when graphed.

For shame.
Posted by at

12 comments:

  1. MSSeptember 9, 2013 at 10:17 AM

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100235012/arctic-ice-melt-is-a-problem-because-right-wing-newspapers-smell-explains-guardian-climate-expert/

    ReplyDelete
  2. MSSeptember 9, 2013 at 10:19 AM

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2013/09/08/ap-hypes-models-claiming-global-warming-involvement-fiercer-storms-uk-me

    ReplyDelete
  3. MSSeptember 9, 2013 at 2:09 PM

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/09/06/jaxa-timing-worst-ever-switching-arctic-sea-ice-software-right-as-the-minimum-is-about-to-happen/#more-93220

    ReplyDelete
  4. MSSeptember 10, 2013 at 12:50 PM

    http://www.clim-past.net/9/2073/2013/cp-9-2073-2013.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  5. MSSeptember 10, 2013 at 12:54 PM

    http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/09/10/arctic-scientists-score-a-big-zero-in-ice-forecasting-so-they-adjust-the-data-downwards/

    ReplyDelete
  6. MSSeptember 11, 2013 at 8:41 AM

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323864604579067243988516908?mg=reno64-wsj.html?dsk=y

    ReplyDelete
  7. MSSeptember 12, 2013 at 2:07 PM

    http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/monthly-ncdc-us-fraud-update/

    ReplyDelete
  8. MSSeptember 13, 2013 at 8:41 AM

    http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/09/06/three-generations-of-data-tampering-and-hiding-the-decline/

    ReplyDelete
  9. MSSeptember 13, 2013 at 9:21 AM

    Arctic ice is affected by winds, currents storms, black carbon, etc ...

    It is a highly variable area.

    This prompted Dr. Alley and group to conclude:

    "thus far, human influence does not stand out relative to other, natural causes of climate change."

    "strong natural variability has been characteristic of the Arctic at all time scales considered,"

    "that the human influence on rate and size of climate change thus far does not stand out strongly from other causes of climate change."

    White, J.W.C., Alley,R.B., Brigham-Grette, J., Fitzpatrick, J.J., Jennings, A.E., Johnsen, S.J., Miller, G.H., Nerem, R.S. and Polyak, L. 2010. Past rates of climate change in the Arctic. Quaternary Science Reviews 29: 1716-1727.

    ReplyDelete
  10. MSSeptember 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM

    http://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2012/09/20/arctic-v-antarctic-temperatures/

    ReplyDelete
  11. MSSeptember 16, 2013 at 1:13 PM

    http://judithcurry.com/2013/09/16/inter-decadal-variation-in-northern-hemisphere-sea-ice/

    ReplyDelete
  12. MSSeptember 23, 2013 at 6:11 PM

    http://www.c3headlines.com/2013/09/those-stubborn-facts-since-2008-noaa-fabricating-fake-global-warming-at-22c-per-century-rate.html

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)